Report 02: Did gravity and vacuum propulsion research go black? (1955–2026)
The FOIA queue's 'gravity' cluster as one argument. Across 70 years, every piece of gravity-control or vacuum-energy research we can see was either published openly, defunded for known reasons, or tested and failed (Biefeld-Brown 1989, Pais 2019). The 'it went black' theory survives only in the gaps: pages missing from NASA's 1997 proceedings, unlisted post-1957 contracts, and the Navy's unreleased Pais test data. Three requests would close those gaps.
Ties
| To | Role | Years | Verdict | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zero-point energy | the vacuum-physics tier list | Concept | ||
| Publication silence as signal | framework and funding check | 1955– | Concept | |
| Harold Puthoff | theory thread 1989–2010 | 1989– | Documented · occurred | |
| AAWSAP | commissioned reviews 2009–10 | 2009 | Documented · occurred | |
| FOIA queue | the 'gravity' rows (#16, #17, #33) | 2026 | Concept | |
| Report 01 - UAP program records | sister report (programs cluster) | 2026 | Concept |
Tied from
| From | Role | Years | Verdict | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Paris Montgolfier tests (1955-56) found thrust in vacuum orders of magnitude beyond ionization | vacuum tests; open funding | Documented · occurred | ||
| Zero-point energy | antigravitics: overlapping claims (gravity control via vacuum) | Concept | ||
| Amy Eskridge | research focus: antigravitics | Documented · occurred | ||
| Thomas Townsend Brown | the central figure of antigravitics | 1920s–1985 | Documented · occurred | |
| The Turner memo shows the 'golden age of general relativity' was cover for gravity-shielding research | the Turner memo's 'gravity program' vs. the open ARL/Goldberg funding | 1955–1973 | Unproven | |
| Turner memo (1971) | the open funding record it overlaps | 1955–1973 | Concept | |
| Publication silence as signal | antigravitics: candidate field that went quiet around 1956–57 | 1956– | Concept | |
| Thomas Townsend Brown | Biefeld-Brown tested: Talley/USAF vacuum null | 1988–1991 | Documented · occurred | |
| Patuxent River UAP claims | Pais patents and the null NAWCAD test; FOIA #33 for the test data | 2016–2019 | Documented · occurred | |
| The US Navy approved Salvatore Pais's inertial-mass-reduction patents after a CTO letter citing China | Pais patents and the null NAWCAD test; the 'Pais effect' | 2016–2019 | Documented · occurred | |
| Report 03 - UAP at nuclear facilities | sister report | 2026 | Concept | |
| Report 04 - UAP injury records | sister report | 2026 | Concept |
Notes
Drafted 2026-09-26. Status: working draft. Nothing filed.
Thesis
If gravity control or vacuum propulsion 'went black,' we'd expect the went-black signature: researchers who stay employed but go silent, money flowing under vague lines, secrecy orders, and later declassifications that refer back to it. What the record shows instead is the died-in-public signature at every point we can check. The question is whether the three remaining gaps hide anything.
Chapter 1: The 1950s boom and the 'silence' (1955–1973)
| Fact | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 'Electrogravitics Systems' (Aviation Studies, Feb 1956) lists Martin, Convair, Bell, Lear, Sperry, GE, Douglas | Report exists | Declassified 1990 |
| Herald Tribune series on gravity research (Talbert, Nov 1956) | {{verified}} | Press |
| Trade-press coverage fades after 1957 (Nick Cook's 'went black' thesis) | Fade real, cause disputed | Hunt for Zero Point (2001) |
| USAF General Physics Lab / ARL funded gravitation research openly ~1956–1970 (Goldberg), producing peer-reviewed GR papers including Kerr's black-hole solution | Open | Kaiser & Rickles |
| Funding ended with the Mansfield Amendment (~1970–73) | Known cause |
Gap: did the companies keep hardware contracts after 1957 that aren't in the open literature? Request: #17 (Air Force ARL/AFOSR contract lists, 1957–1973, for Martin, Convair, Bell, Lear).
Addendum (2026-09-26): the Turner memo. The 1971 Australian JIO memo's '46 USAF anti-gravity projects' matches Keyhoe's 1966 count of 46 unclassified gravity projects in the Smithsonian's public research registry (33 Air Force-controlled). Provisionally, the best-known 'went black' document rests on open research. See Turner memo (1971). Primary text now checked (PURSUE R03, CIA-UAP-019): every named university, scientist and firm matches open sources (the Babson Gravity Research Foundation, the Chapel Hill GR community, the 1956 electrogravitics press list). The memo is interpretation of open research, not evidence of a hidden program.
Chapter 2: Tested and failed in the open (1988–2002)
| Fact | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Veritay (1988–89) tested the Biefeld-Brown effect: negligible thrust in vacuum; it's ionic wind | Null | AF report |
| NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics (1996–2002): small, open, no breakthroughs claimed | Open | NASA |
| BPP 1997 workshop proceedings reportedly stop at p. 389 of 449 | Reported by TWZ | TWZ |
Gap: what's on the missing pages, and who attended? Request: #16 (full BPP 1997 proceedings and attendee list).
Chapter 3: The vacuum-theory era (1989–2011)
| Fact | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Puthoff: gravity (1989) and inertia (1994, with Haisch and Rueda) as zero-point effects | Published | Phys. Rev. A |
| Carlip's comment (1993); Cole, Rueda & Danley (2001) conclude the ZPF-gravity route fails | Rebutted | Phys. Rev. A |
| AAWSAP DIRDs on vacuum/metric engineering, warp drive, antigravity: theory reviews, no hardware | Reviews | DIA FOIA 2022 |
Gap: none. This chapter is entirely public, and it's theory.
Chapter 4: The Navy tried it (2016–2019)
| Fact | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Pais patents (inertial mass reduction, gravitational-wave generator), pushed through over internal NAWCAD objections | Patents | TWZ FOIA emails |
| NAWCAD tested the 'Pais effect' for ~$508K over ~1,600 hours: 'could not be proven' | Null | NAWCAD statement |
Gap: the test data and final report aren't public, so the null result can't be checked. Request: #33 (Section 219 final report and data).
Across the four chapters
| Signature | 1955–73 | 1988–2002 | 1989–2011 | 2016–19 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Published openly | Yes (ARL, RIAS) | Yes (BPP) | Yes (PRA, DIRDs) | Patents yes, data no |
| Tested, null result | — | Biefeld-Brown | Rebuttals | Pais |
| Known reason funding stopped | Mansfield | Program sunset | — | Test failed |
| Unexplained gap | Post-1957 contracts | BPP missing pages | — | Pais data |
Counter-case (to keep this honest)
- Publication silence has worked once (Flyorov, 1942). But in that case the rivals' own programs confirmed it within years. No rival gravity program has surfaced in 70 years.
- Invention secrecy is routine (about 6,500 active orders). Missing patents alone prove nothing.
- If the gaps come back empty, that is a result: the field died, not hid.
The ask, in one line
Three requests (#16, #17, #33) aimed at the only unexplained gaps: missing proceedings pages, post-1957 hardware contracts, and the Pais data.
Before filing
- Check The Black Vault and TWZ for existing releases on BPP and Pais (TWZ already FOIA'd the Pais emails).
- File #33 first. It's recent and specific, and the program is closed.
-
17 is an archival pull (NARA RG 342 / AFOSR histories) more than a FOIA request.
- Antigravitics (merged 2026-09-27): the old one-line card ('a lot of smoke, no fire') is folded in here. The graded evidence on gravity-control claims lives in this report and in Zero-point energy.