The injury-data cluster (FOIA rows #1–3 and #43) as one argument. The records establish three things: (1) real, physician-documented injuries in named people (Cash-Landrum; the D128 benchmark; Havana/AHI); (2) that the government's own analysts in 2010 judged the UAP injury pattern to match radio-frequency/microwave near-field injury, and wrote that 'some advanced systems are already deployed'; (3) a consistent handling pattern: ownership denied, investigator opinion redacted, source data never surfaced, assessments reversed. The records don't establish that any injury was caused by a non-human craft. The strongest attribution-neutral finding is that the symptom profile is an energy-weapon profile, and the government has now bought, and is testing, a human-made device suspected of producing it.
Ties
Tied from
Mentioned in
Notes
Drafted 2026-09-27. Status: working draft.
Thesis
The injuries are the most physically documented part of the UAP record: named people, hospital charts, physicians' signatures. The government's own analysts (D128, 2010) read them as near-field RF/microwave injury. What the records never supply is the source: every case ends at a denial of ownership, a redaction, or source data that was never released.
Chapter 1: Cash-Landrum (29 Dec 1980), the anchor
| Fact |
Status |
Source |
| Three people injured (burns, blistering, hair loss, eye damage, vomiting); hospital records |
injuries |
Medical records; the DAIG file |
| Army IG investigator Sarran: the witnesses were 'credible'; 3.5 lines of his opinion redacted |
redacted |
DAIG report (FOIA) |
| The government admitted owning CH-47s but denied involvement; flight records reported destroyed; suit dismissed without testimony (1986) |
denial + dismissal |
Court file |
| Not whole-body ionizing radiation (normal blood counts; the dose would be fatal); fits skin-limited heat/UV/microwave or chemical exposure |
mechanism narrowed |
Radiologist; Why Files analysis |
| The 'Project Snowbird' nuclear-aircraft explanation |
Doty source |
Doty → Moore |
Chapter 2: DIRD D128 (2010), what the government's analysts concluded
| Fact |
Status |
Source |
| A DIA/AAWSAP paper says Cash-Landrum symptoms are indistinguishable from a documented 785 MHz near-field RF accident (three antenna engineers) |
D128 comparison |
D128 (complete copy, Black Vault 2022) |
| 'Some advanced systems are already deployed, and opaque to full US understanding' |
D128 conclusion |
D128 summary |
| The supporting 'companion' clinical study (Green 2009, Technical Study 10; ICD-coded cases) never released |
source data withheld |
FOIA row #2 |
| Appendices are catalogs (MUFON frequency table: burns 41, eye injuries 54, deaths 5, healing 5), not medical records |
appendices |
D128 Appendix A |
Chapter 3: Havana Syndrome / AHIs (2016–2026), the modern analog
| Fact |
Status |
Source |
| Same symptom family as D128 (pressure, sound, vertigo, headache, cognitive effects) |
symptom overlap |
NIH; D128 injury list |
| 2023 ICA: foreign adversary 'very unlikely' → rescinded 2026 for faulty tradecraft |
reversal |
ODNI; Washington Times |
| NIH (2024): no MRI-detectable injury |
NIH null |
NIH |
| HSI bought a pulsed-RF backpack device (Russian components) for ~$15M; DoD testing for 1+ year |
device acquired |
CNN (Jan 2026) |
Chapter 4: Rendlesham (Dec 1980), the radiation reading
| Fact |
Status |
Source |
| Halt's AN/PDR-27 readings: 0.07 mR/hr in the depressions vs. 0.03–0.04 background; a similar spike half a mile away |
modest readings |
Halt memo; Wikipedia |
| No injuries recorded; the MoD didn't investigate |
not investigated |
MoD |
Chapter 5: What was not collected
| Gap |
Status |
Source |
| No bloodwork from the Nimitz pilots (2004), 'to my knowledge' |
no bloodwork |
Kelleher (2026) |
| Nolan/Green brain imaging of experiencers (caudate–putamen density) exists but isn't tied to any government injury file |
study exists |
Nolan |
| No toxicology run in Cash-Landrum (the chemical hypothesis was never tested) |
test never run |
Why Files / Sarran file |
Findings
- Checkable: the injury pattern across Cash-Landrum, D128 and Havana/AHI is consistent with near-field RF/microwave or directed-energy exposure. The government's own 2010 analysts said so.
- Checkable: in every case the source attribution is closed off by handling, not by evidence: denial of ownership, redaction, dismissal, withheld source studies, or a reversed assessment.
- Interpretive (flagged): the same symptom profile appears whether the suspected source is a UAP (1980) or a portable human-made device (2026). That's compatible with (a) a human energy-weapon program behind some UAP-attributed injuries, or (b) UAP propulsion producing a similar field (D128's hypothesis). The records can't separate the two.
Requests that would close the gaps
- #2 Green 2009 Technical Study 10 and the ICD-coded companion study (DIA).
- #43 Sarran's redacted 3.5 lines (Army IG, mandatory declassification review).
- #3 FAA/radar records for 29 Dec 1980, Houston (partly answered).
- New, #45: DoD test reports on the HSI-acquired device (bioeffects results), when testing concludes.