Claims
GAO audited Lockheed's Burbank special-access (carve-out) document controls in 1986
Documented · occurred What these labels mean →A 24 Jul 1986 GAO review found Lockheed's regular programs 'well managed' but special-access-program (SAP) documents 'not well managed,' with the Defense Investigative Service failing to adequately inspect them; GAO issued a follow-up report to the Secretary of Defense in Aug 1986 on the need for inspections, and a 1987 follow-up on corrective action.
Evidence
| Relation | Record | Note |
|---|---|---|
| documents | gao.gov | GAO, 24 Jul 1986 (fetched via Exa; gao.gov blocks curl): 'the system for the regular programs was well managed'; 'the system for the special access program documents was not well managed'; 'DIS did not sufficiently oversee inspections'. |
| documents | gao.gov | NSIAD-86-191, 'Need for DOD Inspections of Special Access Contracts', published 7 Aug 1986. |
| documents | gao.justia.com | NSIAD-88-2BR (16 Nov 1987) names the site: 'its facility in Burbank, California'; reviews Lockheed's corrective actions. |
| documents | gao.gov | GAO, 24 Jul 1986 |
| documents | gao.gov | NSIAD-86-191, Aug 1986 |
| documents | gao.gov | NSIAD-88-2BR follow-up |
Sources
| Source | Relation | At |
|---|---|---|
| Lockheed UAP claims (UAP Gerb) | reports |
Claim
A 24 Jul 1986 GAO review found Lockheed's regular programs 'well managed' but special-access-program (SAP) documents 'not well managed,' with the Defense Investigative Service failing to adequately inspect them; GAO issued a follow-up report to the Secretary of Defense in Aug 1986 on the need for inspections, and a 1987 follow-up on corrective action.