Claims
A White House 'non-covert action' SAP escapes both 50 USC 3093 and 10 USC 119 reporting
Unproven What these labels mean →Grusch's claim, relayed by Gerb: a White House SAP designated 'non-covert action' falls outside both the covert-action reporting statute (50 USC 3093) and the DoD SAP reporting statute (10 USC 119), since 3093 covers covert action and 119 covers only DoD SAPs, leaving non-DoD White House SAPs in a reporting gap.
Evidence
| Relation | Record | Note |
|---|---|---|
| reports | law.cornell.edu | structurally plausible per statute text; whether any general reporting rule covers non-DoD White House SAPs is the open legal question |
| reports | law.cornell.edu |
Sources
| Source | Relation | At |
|---|---|---|
| SAP loopholes (UAP Gerb Vol 2) | asserts |
Ties
| To | Role | Years | Verdict | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson-Davis notes | 'program record had zero budget info' fits content-only | 2002 | Unproven | |
| David Grusch | source of the non-covert-action loophole (Judicial Watch interview) | 2026 | Unproven | youtube.com |
Claim
Grusch's claim, relayed by Gerb: a White House SAP designated 'non-covert action' falls outside both the covert-action reporting statute (50 USC 3093) and the DoD SAP reporting statute (10 USC 119), since 3093 covers covert action and 119 covers only DoD SAPs, leaving non-DoD White House SAPs in a reporting gap.